United States v. Gibson
United States v. Gibson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6378
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus VANCE MARCEL GIBSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-93-211)
Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his mo- tions for disclosure of the grand jury concurrence form and return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gibson, No. CR-93-211 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.