U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Farmer

United States v. Farmer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 1997

United States v. Farmer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6128

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BEDFORD EUGENE FARMER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CR-92-174, CA-96-676-1)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bedford Eugene Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion ac- cepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Farmer, Nos. CR-92-174; CA-96-676-1 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.