U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Preston v. United States

Preston v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 1997

Preston v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6065

STEPHEN LOVE PRESTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-111, CA-96-413-R)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Love Preston, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Preston v. United States, Nos. CR-88-111; CA-96-413-R (W.D.

Va. Dec. 17, 1996). The Government's motion to dismiss is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.