U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Lawrence v. Montgomery Cnty Scho

Lawrence v. Montgomery Cnty Scho
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 1997

Lawrence v. Montgomery Cnty Scho

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1902

HANS ALEXANDER LAWRENCE, by his parents and next friends, Trude and Dale Lawrence; TRUDE LAWRENCE; DALE LAWRENCE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; PAUL L.

VANCE, Doctor, officially; MARY HELEN SMITH, Doctor, officially; RAYMOND W. BRYANT, Doctor, officially, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-330-JFM) Submitted: April 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dale Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. Zvi Greismann, Assistant Attorney General, Rockville, Maryland; Phillip Tyson Bennett, REESE & CARNEY, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting De- fendants' motion to dismiss for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and dismissing Appellants' action pursuant to the civil remedies provisions of the Individuals with Disabili- ties Education Act, 20 U.S.C.A. § 1415(e)(4)(B) (West Supp. 1996).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lawrence v. Montgomery County Pub. Schools, No. CA-96-330-JFM (D. Md. May 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.