U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Hamilton v. Wainwright

Hamilton v. Wainwright
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 1997

Hamilton v. Wainwright

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6042

HENRY ERIC HAMILTON; CHESTER JAMES DOLES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus SIMON WAINWRIGHT, Captain, in official and in- dividual capacities; JUDY SMITH, Sergeant, in official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees, and S. MOCK, Hearing Officer, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 1240-AMD) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Eric Hamilton, Chester James Doles, Appellants Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Audrey J. S. Carrion, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Hamilton v. Wainwright, No. CA-95-1240-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 27, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.