U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Tyson v. Pitt County Govt

Tyson v. Pitt County Govt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 1997

Tyson v. Pitt County Govt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1241

JAMES TYSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PITT COUNTY GOVERNMENT; PITT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees, and EDWARD GARRISON, Director, in his official and individual capacity; WILLIAM PERRY, Adminis- trator, in his official and individual capac- ity; RUTH HINES, Supervisor, in her official and individual capacity, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-95-133-4-H(3)) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Tyson, Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl A. Marteney, WARD & SMITH, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina; Pamela Weaver Best, PITT COUNTY LEGAL DEPARTMENT, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tyson v. Pitt County Gov't, No. CA-95-133-4-H(3) (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.