U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Russell v. Brigman

Russell v. Brigman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 5, 1997

Russell v. Brigman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6377

CHRISTOPHER ARENDS RUSSELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

BENNIE BRIGMAN, Superintendent, Bladen County North Carolina Correctional Unit, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-416-V)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997.) We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of ap- pealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Russell v. Brigman, No. CA-93-416-V (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.