Page v. Murray
Page v. Murray
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7725
TERRY O'CONNOR PAGE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus
EDWARD MURRAY, Director, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-12)
Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry O'Connor Page, Appellant Pro Se. Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN- ERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appel- lant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Page v. Murray, No. CA-94-12 (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.