U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Tucker v. State of SC Justice

Tucker v. State of SC Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 10, 1997

Tucker v. State of SC Justice

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6365

JAMES VERNON TUCKER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA JUSTICE COMMITTEE; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA- 96-1707-0-18BD)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 10, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Vernon Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. South Carolina, No. CA-96-1707-0-18BD (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.