High v. Murray
High v. Murray
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6147
VIRGINIA C. HIGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
JACK MURRAY; CYNTHIA SHIELDS; HARLEY LAPPIN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-96-1044-5-H)
Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 17, 1997
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Virginia C. High, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on * her Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. High v. Murray, No. CA-96-1044-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 395 (1971).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.