U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Troni v. Hanlon

Troni v. Hanlon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 27, 1997

Troni v. Hanlon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1271

LORENZO TRONI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PETER HANLON; LESLIE HANLON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1634-A)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Troni, Appellant Pro Se. Colin Frazier Bell, Philippe M.

Salomon, WILLKIE, FARR & GALLAGHER, New York, New York, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for default judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We deny Appellant's motion for sanctions, grant Appellee's motion to dismiss the case because the appeal is interlocutory, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.