U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

In Re: Stewart v.

In Re: Stewart v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 27, 1997

In Re: Stewart v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-518

In Re: DAVID GARFIELD STEWART, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-90-23-A)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Garfield Stewart, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: David Garfield Stewart brought this mandamus petition seeking an order compelling the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to rule on his third motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). Because we note that 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West Supp. 1997) provides that no district court "shall be required to entertain" a successive application for the writ of habeas corpus without certification from this court under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, we conclude that petitioner is not entitled to the relief he seeks without such a certification. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.