United States v. Hoke
United States v. Hoke
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7698
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
GARY ELLIOTT HOKE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-91-1-MU)
Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Elliott Hoke, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appel- lant's motion to amend his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hoke, No. CR-91-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.