U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Gragg

United States v. Gragg
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 1997

United States v. Gragg

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7917

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JAMES CLARK GRAGG, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-491, CR-94-156, CR-94-157, CA-96-2097-6-3)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Glenn Yarborough, III, ASHMORE & YARBOROUGH, P.A., Green- ville, South Carolina, for Appellant. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gragg, Nos. CR-93-491; CR-94-156; CR-94- 157; CA-96-2097-6-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.