U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Harris v. United States

Harris v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 1997

Harris v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6986

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RANDALL BRICE HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-12-P)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall Brice Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo- tion for modification of his term of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harris, No. CR-94-12-P (W.D.N.C. May 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.