U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Gustilo v. Robert Bosch Corp

Gustilo v. Robert Bosch Corp
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 1997

Gustilo v. Robert Bosch Corp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1495

ESTER M. GUSTILO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ROBERT BOSCH CORPORATION; JOE MASHING, Defendants - Appellees,

MIKE CUTRELL; KAREN BRYAN; MARK LENTZ; YVONNE MARTIN, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-261-2-21)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: July 1, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ester M. Gustilo, Appellant Pro Se. Cherie W. Blackburn, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel- lees' motion for summary judgment in this action filed pursuant to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12111(2)(a) (West 1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, Gustilo v. Robert Bosch Corp. , No. CA-96- 261-2-21 (D.S.C. Mar. 12 and 13, 1997), and deny Appellees' motion for sanctions against Appellant for damages, attorneys' fees and costs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.