Gustilo v. Robert Bosch Corp
Gustilo v. Robert Bosch Corp
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1495
ESTER M. GUSTILO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
ROBERT BOSCH CORPORATION; JOE MASHING, Defendants - Appellees,
MIKE CUTRELL; KAREN BRYAN; MARK LENTZ; YVONNE MARTIN, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-261-2-21)
Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: July 1, 1997
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ester M. Gustilo, Appellant Pro Se. Cherie W. Blackburn, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel- lees' motion for summary judgment in this action filed pursuant to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12111(2)(a) (West 1995). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, Gustilo v. Robert Bosch Corp. , No. CA-96- 261-2-21 (D.S.C. Mar. 12 and 13, 1997), and deny Appellees' motion for sanctions against Appellant for damages, attorneys' fees and costs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.