U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Wages v. Beck

Wages v. Beck
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 1997

Wages v. Beck

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6188

JOSEPH EDWARD WAGES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

THEOTIS BECK; NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-13-6)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Edward Wages, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Kendrick Cleveland, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wages v. Beck, No. CA-96-13-6 (M.D.N.C. Jan.

29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.