U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Dehoney v. Jones

Dehoney v. Jones
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 1997

Dehoney v. Jones

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6596

MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

RUTH JONES, Deputy Clerk of the United States Supreme Court, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr. District Judge. (CA-96-2746-4-21BE)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion to amend said order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Jones, No. CA-96-2746-4-21BE (D.S.C. Mar. 12 and Apr. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.