Dehoney v. Reed
Dehoney v. Reed
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6465
MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
RAYMOND REED, JR., Major; JAMES L. HARVEY, Midlands Regional Director; PATRICIA RAINEY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1116-4-21BE)
Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: July 8, 1997
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Reed, No. CA-96- 1116-4-21BE (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.