United States v. Mcphaul
United States v. Mcphaul
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
JOHN MCPHAUL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-95-22-BO, CA-96-127-BO)
Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John McPhaul, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Elaine Tompkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: John McPhaul seeks to appeal the district court's order deny- ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. McPhaul, Nos. CR-95-22-BO; CA-96-127- BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.