U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Fowler v. Ferrell

Fowler v. Ferrell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 1997

Fowler v. Ferrell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6349

HARRY JAMES FOWLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

FORREST A. FERRELL, Judge; BEVERLY T. BEAL, Superior Court Judge; ROGER HUTCHINS; STEVE REED, Major; LIEUTENANT HARTSO; ANN BECK, Sergeant; CLARA PARSONS, Matron, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-4-MU)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry James Fowler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fowler v. Ferrell, No. CA-97-4-MU (W.D.N.C., Feb. 12, 1997). We deny Ap- pellant's motion for leave to amend his complaint and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.