U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Davis v. Stone

Davis v. Stone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 1997

Davis v. Stone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6326

ROBERT LEE DAVIS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

HUBERT STONE, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-896-5-H)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Davis v. Stone, No. CA-96-896-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24 & Feb. 19, 1997). We deny the motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* We note that before petitioner files any subsequent habeas petitions in the district court he must seek authorization to file a successive petition with this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A.

§§ 2244, 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.