Bruce v. Peatross
Bruce v. Peatross
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6442
DONNIE LEE BRUCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
PAUL M. PEATROSS; JAMES L. CAMBLOSS, III; CHERYL HIGGINS; DENISE Y. LUNSFORD; DEBORAH K.
HITE; EARL SHIFFLETT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-163-2)
Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donnie Lee Bruce, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court and deny Appellant's "Motion to Amend." Bruce v. Peatross, No. CA-97-163-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.