U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Acosta

United States v. Acosta
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 7, 1997

United States v. Acosta

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ENRIQUE ACOSTA, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-317, CA-96-1862-6)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall Scott Hiller, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant.

David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Green- ville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Acosta, Nos. CR-92-317; CA-96-1862-6 (D.S.C. Feb.

28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.