U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Scott v. Rainey

Scott v. Rainey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 7, 1997

Scott v. Rainey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6498

BARRETT K. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PATRICIA RAINEY; CHARLIE J. CEPAK; JAMES L.

HARVEY; PARKER EVATT, in their individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-95-3103-4-19BE)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barrett K. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Rainey, No. CA-95- 3103-4-19BE (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.