U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Betts

United States v. Betts
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 1997

United States v. Betts

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ANTHONY S.O. BETTS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-22, CA-97-65-AM)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony S.O. Betts, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Betts, Nos. CR-92-22; CA-97-65-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 1997). We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.