U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Palmai v. Cammarata

Palmai v. Cammarata
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 1997

Palmai v. Cammarata

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1468

LASZLO GEORGE PALMAI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JOSEPH CAMMARATA; GERALD B. LEE, Judge; GILBERT K. DAVIS & ASSOCIATES, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-100-A)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Laszlo George Palmai, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Cammarata, Washing- ton, D.C.; Gregory E. Lucyk, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIR- GINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Henry St. John Fitzgerald, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting De- fendants' motions to dismiss Appellant's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Palmai v. Cammarata, No. CA-97-100-A (E.D.

Va. Mar. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.