U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Jones v. Purnell

Jones v. Purnell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 1997

Jones v. Purnell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6312

CHARLES JONES, a/k/a Nicholas Warner Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THEODORE PURNELL; REICLYN, Captain; EUGENE NUTH; J. REVELL, Captain; J. STROCKE, Lieuten- ant; M. DIGGS, Major; L. CARTER, Sergeant; SERGEANT WATKINS; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; JOHN PARKER, Adjustment Hearing Officer, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95- 645-L)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Purnell, No. CA- 95-645-L (D. Md. Feb 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.