U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Gange v. Beshears

Gange v. Beshears
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 1997

Gange v. Beshears

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6059

JOHN H. GANGE, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus

EARL D. BESHEARS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-95-3901-WMN)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Gange, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ellen Barbera, Assis- tant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for ap- pointment of counsel, deny a certificate of probable cause to ap- peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Gange v. Beshears, No. CA-95-3901-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 27, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.