U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Duran

United States v. Duran
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 5, 1997

United States v. Duran

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7675

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

SANTIAGO DURAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-106-A, CA-95-1765-AM)

Submitted: July 1, 1997 Decided: August 5, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Santiago Duran, Appellant Pro Se. Gerald J. Smagala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Duran, Nos. CR-94-106-A; CA-95-1765-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 1996). Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; his motion for appointment of counsel and to remand his case are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.