U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Strable v. Administrative Off

Strable v. Administrative Off
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 1997

Strable v. Administrative Off

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1506

DONALD J. STRABLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 97-1507

DONALD J. STRABLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA JUSTICE COMMITTEE, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 97-1643

DONALD J. STRABLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-530-6-13AK, CA-97-179-6-13AK, CA-97-530-6)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald J. Strable, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Keith Wray II, GIBBES, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil actions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.

Strable v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, No. CA-97-530-6-13AK (D.S.C. Apr. 8, 1997; Strable v. South Carolina Justice Comm., No. CA-97-179-6-13AK (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 1997); Strable v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts, No. CA-97- 530-6 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.