U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Davis-El v. Cisneros

Davis-El v. Cisneros
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 10, 1997

Davis-El v. Cisneros

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1064

CLYDE M. DAVIS-EL, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

HENRY G. CISNEROS, Secretary, HUD; HAROLD YOUNG, Acting State Coordinator, Maryland State Office; ROGER WILLIS, Acting Chief, R.E.O. Branch for Maryland State Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT; OTHER UNNAMED AGENTS, Defendants - Appellees, and

ALAN W. HEIFETZ, Chief Administrative Law Judge, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96- 1857-MJG)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 10, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clyde M. Davis-El, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Donna Carol Sanger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis-El v. Cisneros, et al. No. CA-96-1857-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 12, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.