U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Nance v. Pike

Nance v. Pike
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 9, 1997

Nance v. Pike

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7021

JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WAYNE PIKE, Sheriff, County of Wythe, Vir- ginia; SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Wythe County; COUNTY OF WYTHE, VIRGINIA; UNNAMED DEPUTIES; MARTY STALLARD; TONY BOLLING; C. M. COLLINS; JAMES E. SCOTT; ROBERT W. BURNETT; DEPUTY CRALLEY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-149-R)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 9, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Kevin Scott Blair, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia; William Fain Rutherford, Jr., FLIPPIN, DENSMORE, MORSE, RUTHERFORD & JESSEE, Roanoke, Virginia; Grace Mary DiLiberto, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nance v. Pike, No. CA-94-149-R (W.D. Va. June 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.