Hagler v. Miro
Hagler v. Miro
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7581
CHARLES SERGIO HAGLER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden; LIEUTENANT NEWTON; MR. PATE, SMHU Manager, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-3763-4-22-BE)
Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 9, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Sergio Hagler, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Llewellyn Pope, POPE & RODGERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hagler v. Miro, No. CA-95-3763-4-22-BE (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.