U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Nwanze

United States v. Nwanze
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 19, 1997

United States v. Nwanze

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7708

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

AUSTEN O. NWANZE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-4)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 19, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Austen O. Nwanze, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nwanze, No. CR-92-4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.