United States v. Jones
United States v. Jones
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6213
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOCK DECARLOS JONES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-424-JFM, CA-97-87-JFM)
Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 19, 1997
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jock DeCarlos Jones, Appellant Pro Se. William Warren Hamel, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-92-424-JFM; CA-97-87-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 21, 1997). Additionally, we dismiss the § 2255 motion to
vacate sentence that the Appellant filed in this court. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished