Stalvey v. United States
Stalvey v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6391
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEORGE RONALD STALVEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-90-190-MU, CA-95-174-3-MU)
Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 19, 1997
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Ronald Stalvey, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion to reconsider the denial of his motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994) (current version at
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 &
Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stalvey v. United States, Nos. CR- 90-190-MU; CA-95-174-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 1997). See Lindh v.
Murphy,
521 U.S. ___,
1997 WL 338568(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-
6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished