Graves v. Gwynn Gwynn & Farver
Graves v. Gwynn Gwynn & Farver
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1686
WALTER B. GRAVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GWYNN, GWYNN & FARVER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-892-2)
Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 19, 1997
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter B. Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Jay Short, Jr., GWYNN, GWYNN & FARVER, L.L.P., Reidsville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Graves v. Gwynn, Gwynn & Farver, No. CA-96-892-2 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished