Abdullah v. Moore
Abdullah v. Moore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7927
MALCOLM OMAWALE ABDULLAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MICHAEL B. MOORE; OMAR SHAHEED; WILLIAM D.
CATOE; RALPH S. BEARDSLEY; TOM SMITH, Detective, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1028-10-21BD)
Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 18, 1997
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Omawale Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert Eric Petersen, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Byron Ronald Roberts, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Abdullah v. Moore, No. CA- 96-1028-10-21BD (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.