UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6581

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CARLOS ORTIZ, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-6661

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ADRIAN SCOTT, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 97-6665

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

HENRY JONES, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-92-301-S, CA-97-1065-S, CA-97-1182-S, CA-97-1103-S)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Ortiz, Adrian Scott, Henry Jones, Appellants Pro Se. Brent Jefferson Gurney, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court's orders denying their motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin- ions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certifi- cates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ortiz, Nos. CR-92-301-S; CA- 97-1065-S (D. Md. Apr. 17, 1997); United States v. Scott, Nos. CR- 92-301-S; CA-97-1182-S (D. Md. Apr. 24, 1997); United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-92-301-S; CA-97-1103-S (D. Md. Apr. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED