U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Robinson v. Atkins

Robinson v. Atkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 17, 1997

Robinson v. Atkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6773

RESTONEY ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DEAN ATKINS; DENNIS A. WICKER, Lieutenant Gov- ernor; JAMES J. COMAN, Director; CHRISTOPHER BREWER; GAYL MANTHEI, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1017-6)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. John Hamilton Watters, Spe- cial Deputy Attorney General, Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Atkins, No. CA- 96-1017-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.