Robinson v. Atkins
Robinson v. Atkins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6773
RESTONEY ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
DEAN ATKINS; DENNIS A. WICKER, Lieutenant Gov- ernor; JAMES J. COMAN, Director; CHRISTOPHER BREWER; GAYL MANTHEI, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1017-6)
Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. John Hamilton Watters, Spe- cial Deputy Attorney General, Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Atkins, No. CA- 96-1017-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.