Robinson v. Atkins

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Robinson v. Atkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6773

RESTONEY ROBINSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEAN ATKINS; DENNIS A. WICKER, Lieutenant Gov- ernor; JAMES J. COMAN, Director; CHRISTOPHER BREWER; GAYL MANTHEI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1017-6)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. John Hamilton Watters, Spe- cial Deputy Attorney General, Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Atkins, No. CA- 96-1017-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished