Tolbert v. Deeds
Tolbert v. Deeds
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6122
JAMES DALLAS TOLBERT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus
GEORGE DEEDS, Respondent - Appellee.
No. 97-6774
JAMES DALLAS TOLBERT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE DEEDS, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-116-R) Submitted: August 5, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Dallas Tolbert, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assis- tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: James Dallas Tolbert seeks to appeal, in No. 97-6122, the dis- trict court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Tolbert v. Deeds, No. CA-96-116-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 23, 1996).
Turning to Tolbert's appeal in No. 97-6774, we note that this is an appeal from a post-judgment motion for the provision of records and transcripts to aid in preparation of the appeal in No. 97-6122. Because Tolbert appeals directly from the magistrate judge's order, we find that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. We therefore dismiss this appeal as well.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Even if we were to construe Tolbert's notice of appeal as a motion for production filed in this Court, we note that the record on appeal transmitted to this court appears to contain all the materials encompassed by Tolbert's request.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.