Redmond v. Montgomery
Redmond v. Montgomery
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6163
DAVID R. REDMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BENJAMIN MONTGOMERY; WILLIE WELDON; SHERRY LOPEZ; WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP; ANGELA P. RUIZ; OFFICER GROVIER; GLENDA HINMAN; JEAN RANDALL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-488-4-17AK)
Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David R. Redmond, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's
recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. Redmond v. Montgomery, No. CA-96-488-4-17AK (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 1997). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished