U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Redmond v. Montgomery

Redmond v. Montgomery
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 16, 1997

Redmond v. Montgomery

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6163

DAVID R. REDMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BENJAMIN MONTGOMERY; WILLIE WELDON; SHERRY LOPEZ; WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP; ANGELA P. RUIZ; OFFICER GROVIER; GLENDA HINMAN; JEAN RANDALL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-488-4-17AK)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David R. Redmond, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Redmond v. Montgomery, No. CA-96-488-4-17AK (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.