Dove v. Davis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Dove v. Davis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6342

ARTHUR CARL DOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAUL J. DAVIS, Chairman, Maryland Parole Commission; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner, Division of Correction; MELANIE C. PEREIRA, Deputy Commissioner, Division of Correction; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden, Maryland Correc- tional Pre-Release System; ALLEN FEIKEN, Hearing Officer; Maryland Parole Commission; FRANK PAPPAS, Commissioner, Maryland Parole Commission,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-2145-AW)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Carl Dove, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dove v. Davis, No. CA-96-2145-AW (D. Md. Oct. 28, 1996; Nov. 22, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished