U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Brady

United States v. Brady
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 23, 1997

United States v. Brady

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6819

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

PHILIP MICHAEL BRADY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-95-465-PJM, CA-97-792-HNM)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip Michael Brady, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brady, No. CR-95- 465-PJM; CA-97-792-HNM (D. Md. Apr. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.