Ricks v. Thomas

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ricks v. Thomas

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6694

DARRELL L. RICKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

F. THOMAS, Clerk, Circuit Court for Baltimore City,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 97-6848

DARRELL L. RICKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

M. SANSOR, Clerk, Court of Special Appeals,

Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 97-228-DKC, CA-97-335-DKC)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell L. Ricks, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Julia Melville Freit, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

In appeal No. 97-6694, Appellant, a Maryland inmate, appeals

the district court's order denying relief on his motion for recon-

sideration of the court's order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. In appeal No. 97-6848, Appellant appeals

the district court's orders denying relief on his § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997), and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and the district

court's opinions and find that the appeals are frivolous. Accord-

ingly, we dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Ricks v. Thomas, No. CA-97-228-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 17, 1997); Ricks v. Sansor, No. CA-97-335-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 30, 1997). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished