Wright v. Robinson
Wright v. Robinson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6662
WALTER LEE WRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BISHOP ROBINSON, Secretary, in his individual and official capacity; THOMAS CORCORAN, War- den, in his individual and official capacity; GARY HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden, in his indi- vidual and official capacity; JAMES MURPHY, Chief of Security, in his individual and offi- cial capacity; KELVIN FURLOW, Sergeant, in his individual and official capacity; MICHAEL THOMPSON, CO II, in his individual and offi- cial capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-2417-AW)
Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Lee Wright, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Robinson, No. CA-96-2417-AW (D. Md. Apr. 1, 1997). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished