Wright v. Robinson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wright v. Robinson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6662

WALTER LEE WRIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BISHOP ROBINSON, Secretary, in his individual and official capacity; THOMAS CORCORAN, War- den, in his individual and official capacity; GARY HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden, in his indi- vidual and official capacity; JAMES MURPHY, Chief of Security, in his individual and offi- cial capacity; KELVIN FURLOW, Sergeant, in his individual and official capacity; MICHAEL THOMPSON, CO II, in his individual and offi- cial capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-2417-AW)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter Lee Wright, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Robinson, No. CA-96-2417-AW (D. Md. Apr. 1, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished