Azeez v. Duncil

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Azeez v. Duncil

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6520

JAMAL A. AZEEZ,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM DUNCIL, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-96-497-5)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal A. Azeez, Appellant Pro Se. Rory Lee Perry, II, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Azeez v. Duncil, No. CA-96-497-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 26, 1997). Appel- lant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished