U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Bramwell

United States v. Bramwell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 9, 1997

United States v. Bramwell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6999

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CAROL BRAMWELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-429-A, CA-97-682-AM)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bramwell, Nos. CR-91-429-A; CA-97-682-AM (E.D. Va. May 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.