Grissette v. NC Dept of Corr
Grissette v. NC Dept of Corr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6942
AMOS RAY GRISSETTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; LIEUTENANT CREECH; SERGEANT DREW; SERGEANT EUBANKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-97-348-5-BR)
Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amos Ray Grissette, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint without prejudice for failure to ex-
haust administrative remedies. The district court properly required
exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a)
(West Supp. 1997). Because Appellant did not demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or
that such remedies were not available, the court's dismissal of the
action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We
therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished